![]() ![]() The Polaroid and Canon both use ZINK paper (meaning, Zero Ink). The other major difference comes down to the printing format. To get an idea of their size, here's all three printers next to a standard pack of playing cards. While the size is definitely noticeable, the weight difference is pretty negligible given that none of these printers are heavy by any stretch of the word. While the Canon and Polaroid are pretty comparable to a portable hard drive, the Fujifilm feels closer to single-serving cereal boxes in size. The Fujifilm is a bit thicker and heavier than the other two. With that out of the way, lets start with the obvious. Spec-wise, the Canon and Polaroid are virtually the same (this will come up again). Rechargeable 500mAh Lithium Polymer battery ![]() ![]() Our selections were the Polaroid ZIP, Canon Ivy and Fujifilm Instax Share SP2, though it should be noted that many other brands have comparable offerings including HP and Kodak. So, we took three of the most popular models and played around with them to see which one we like best. Our selections were the Polaroid ZIP, Canon Ivy and Fujifilm Instax Share SP2įor a lot of photographers, these printers will feel a little gimmicky, but that doesn't mean they aren't useful and fun. These pocket printers all work in basically the same way: They're powered by rechargeable batteries, and once you connect your smartphone or camera via Wi-Fi/Bluetooth you pick your image, make an edit via the app (if you want to) and then click print. Enter pocket printers, a recent addition to the accessories market that offer portable, fast and simple photo printing. With the resurgence of the instant camera, photographers and non-photographers alike have found a new love for printed photos. From left to right: Fujifilm Instax Share SP-2, Canon Ivy, Polaroid ZIP ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |